Human Centered AI Design Principles for Collaborative and Assistive Intelligent Systems
Abstract
Human‑Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) focuses on designing AI systems that augment human capabilities, support meaningful collaboration, and respect user needs, values, and context. In collaborative and assistive intelligent systems, human‑centered design principles ensure that technology aligns with human goals, fosters trust, enables transparency, and enhances overall user experience while mitigating risks associated with automation bias, loss of control, or unintended harm. This paper presents an extensive exploration of design principles for human‑centered AI in collaborative and assistive contexts, highlighting theoretical foundations, practical frameworks, and evaluation strategies. It synthesizes existing research on user‑centric interaction, interpretability, adaptability, and socio‑ethical considerations, and proposes a structured methodology for embedding human‑centered principles throughout the AI system lifecycle. We discuss advantages such as improved usability, trustworthiness, and task effectiveness, alongside disadvantages and challenges including design complexity and resource constraints. Through qualitative and empirical evaluation, the impact of human‑centered design on system adoption and performance is examined. The results underscore the necessity of integrating human values, accessibility, and participatory methods in AI design. The paper concludes with future research directions emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, real‑world validation, and regulatory frameworks to ensure responsible, inclusive, and effective human‑AI partnerships
Article Information
Journal |
International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Information Technology (IJAESIT) |
|---|---|
Volume (Issue) |
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Information Technology (IJAESIT) |
DOI |
|
Pages |
9585-9591 |
Published |
July 13, 2022 |
| Copyright | |
Open Access |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite |
Payal Dubey Rajat (2022). Human Centered AI Design Principles for Collaborative and Assistive Intelligent Systems. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Information Technology (IJAESIT) , Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Information Technology (IJAESIT) , pp. 9585-9591. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJAESIT.2022.0504001 |
References
2. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors.
3. Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed initiative user interfaces. CHI.
4. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors.
5. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction.
6. Carroll, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). Human–Computer Interaction in the New Millennium.
7. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering.
8. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions.
9. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction.
10. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction.
11. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition.
12. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction.
13. Baxter, G. D., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers.
14. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for levels of automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
15. Konakalla, K. (2020). Automated commission calculation and sales quota management in Salesforce: A code-driven approach for sales efficiency. International Journal, 7, 125-127.
16. Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching User Experiences.
17. McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as Experience.
18. Friedman, B., et al. (2002). Value sensitive design. Human–Computer Interaction.
19. Sarter, N. B., Woods, D. D., & Billings, C. E. (1997). Automation surprises. Human Factors.
20. Salvendy, G. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics.
21. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User Centered System Design.
22. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis.
23. Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future.
24. Kulesza, T., Burnett, M., Wong, W. K., & Stumpf, S. (2015). Principles of explainable AI. VL/HCC.
25. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. AI Magazine.
26. Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. FAT
27. Amershi, S., et al. (2019). Guidelines for human AI interaction. CHI.
28. Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. (2018). AI augmented workforce. Harvard Business Review.
29. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. KDD.
30. Doshi Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable AI. ArXiv
31. Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2021). A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Lifecycle. FAT.